Feeding a SOM (or a population of them)

November 11, 2011 § Leave a comment

Most likely, words and objects are not a suitable diet for SOMs.

We can’t feed them as whole pieces, nor chopped into letters. Quine proofed the the fact of a fundamental indeterminacy regarding words and objects [1]. Many computer scientists are getting despaired and try to define how the world should look like, which they then sell as “ontology”, insolently enough.

More seriously, in the traditional perspective (AI, data mining) the question is which data to take and how to “prepare” that data. Yet, put in this way, these questions are “wrong,” at least upside-down, similar to the word/reference game, or the frame game in artificial intelligence, which funny enough is also called symbol grounding problem. Here it is again, the territory, even quite literally. We should not ground symbols, we should create them by swimming. Probably much like the bubble chamber in early particle physics.

(to be cont’d)

 

 

 

[1] W.v.O. Quine, Word and Object, 1960, Cambridge, Mass. 1960.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Feeding a SOM (or a population of them) at The "Putnam Program".

meta

%d bloggers like this: